Novel Technologies for Future Large X-ray Telescopes  
  R. Hudec, , L. Pína, A. Inneman, V. Semencová, M. Skulinová, L. Švéda, V. Brožek, J. Šik, M. Míka, R. Kačerovský, T. Kubina, 
The parameters of the GTF may be improved by:

  • optimization of the glass material (limited)
  • optimization ot the mandrel material/design
  • optimization of the GTF process
  • optimization of the GTF temperature and duration


  • Expectations (goals)

  • microroughness of float-glass not degradated - ~ 0.5 nm rms
  • deviation PV < 0.02 microns
  • FLOAT FLAT GLASS 70 x 100 x 0.3 mm (Interferometer ZYGO)
    fig1

    fig1

    profile plot
    fig1

    3D plot


    FLOAT FLAT GLASS 70x100x0.3 mm
    fig1

    Optical profilometer STIL
    fig1

    roughness analysis
    fig1

    shape analysis – dashed line
    fig1

    shape analysis
    Various approaches in Glass Thermal Forming
    Glass Thermal Forming - one of studied approaches - Parabolic Profile
    fig1

    fig1

    Float glass samples: 24x76x1 mm - GTF using a composite mandrel
    THIN GLASS FOILS SHAPING .PARABOLA 100x150x0.75 mm
    fig1

    fig1

    Thermally bent glass foils, test cylindrical surface R = 1.3 m, 30 x 30 cm, 0.75 mm thick
    profile measurement need to improve the plate holding
    fig1

    fig1

    Comparison of profile of mandrel and replicated flass foil: the deviations are typically less than
    2 ... 3 microns, replica better fit the ideal profile, further improvements and optimization is in progress
    fig1

    Deviations of the real profile of the formed glass foil from the ideal profile for T=630 C for "optimized" T (670 C) they are < 1 micron (peak to valley), for too low T (560 T) however 45 microns
    fig1

    fig1

    GLASS BENT MIRROR, 100x150x0.75 mm
    Shape analysis from profilometer PARABOLA
    THE ROLE OF THE TEMPERATURE IN THE FORMING
    fig1

    y = 0 => middle of the sample
    y = 49.5 => edge of the sample
    fig1

    The influence of T: green T1, red T2, blue T3
    The temperature dependence of the deviation from the ideal surface
    Preliminary results - GTF

  • surface microroughness not degradated down to measuring accuracy ~ 0.5 ... 1 nm
  • profile deviations 0.7 micron (peak-valley) in the best case, expectations < 0.02 micron
  • sensitive to T = need for optimization
  • sensitive to mandrel design/material/process = need for optimization


  • SUMMARY

  • Samples of test X-ray mirrors have been produced using novel technologies
  • Shaped thin glass mirrors and Si mirrors have been succeslully produced
  • Both approaches show promising results justifying further efforts in these directions
  • fig1

    Results of measurements on float glass samples formed at different temperatures-the dependence of the slope deviation on the temperature. The slope deviations from the ideal profile strongly depends on forming temperature and can be less than 1 micron. Tg is the transformation temperature of the used glass
    We acknowledge collaboration with ON Semiconductor CR, Rožnov pod Radhoštěm, Optical Development Workshop of the AS CR Turnov, and TTS sro Prague
    DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT |  BACK |  HOME

    Page generated:


    -->